Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Samoa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
31.2 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Samoa
133.12 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
14th
Samoa rank
13th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Samoa
050100150197019962022

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 133.12 current US$ per square kilometre against 31.2 current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 101.92 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Samoa's figure about 4.3 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Samoa ahead.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 14th and Samoa ranks 13th of 44 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Samoa Difference Ahead
1970s 2.71 current US$ per square kilometre 18.85 current US$ per square kilometre 16.14 current US$ per square kilometre Samoa
1990s 22.6 current US$ per square kilometre 14.13 current US$ per square kilometre 8.46 current US$ per square kilometre Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2020s 30.25 current US$ per square kilometre 133.12 current US$ per square kilometre 102.88 current US$ per square kilometre Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Samoa?
Samoa, at 133.12 current US$ per square kilometre against 31.2 current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2020.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Samoa?
101.92 current US$ per square kilometre, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Samoa?
5 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2020.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Samoa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 14th and Samoa ranks 13th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Samoa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/samoa/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Samoa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 7,513 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.