Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
31.2 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
South Sudan
123.73 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
14th
South Sudan rank
15th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • South Sudan
050100150197019962023

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 123.73 current US$ per square kilometre against 31.2 current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 92.53 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 4.0 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 11 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 14th and South Sudan ranks 15th of 44 groups.

South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 34.48 current US$ per square kilometre 119.16 current US$ per square kilometre 84.69 current US$ per square kilometre South Sudan
2020s 30.71 current US$ per square kilometre 110.05 current US$ per square kilometre 79.34 current US$ per square kilometre South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 123.73 current US$ per square kilometre against 31.2 current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and South Sudan?
92.53 current US$ per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and South Sudan?
11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and South Sudan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 14th and South Sudan ranks 15th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/south-sudan/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 7,513 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.