Mozambique vs South Asia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per

Mozambique
72.25 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Asia
18.45 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique rank
21st
South Asia rank
24th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per over time

  • Mozambique
  • South Asia
0255075100125196119922023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 72.25 current US$ per square kilometre against 18.45 current US$ per square kilometre in South Asia, a difference of 53.8 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 3.9 times South Asia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was South Asia ahead.

Mozambique ranks 21st and South Asia ranks 24th of 142 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 5 and South Asia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique South Asia Difference Ahead
1970s 8.61 current US$ per square kilometre 11.07 current US$ per square kilometre 2.47 current US$ per square kilometre South Asia
1980s 32.35 current US$ per square kilometre 20.56 current US$ per square kilometre 11.79 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
1990s 72.54 current US$ per square kilometre 23.51 current US$ per square kilometre 49.03 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
2000s 78.09 current US$ per square kilometre 30.47 current US$ per square kilometre 47.62 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
2010s 69.86 current US$ per square kilometre 27.34 current US$ per square kilometre 42.52 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
2020s 68.94 current US$ per square kilometre 20.09 current US$ per square kilometre 48.85 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per, Mozambique or South Asia?
Mozambique, at 72.25 current US$ per square kilometre against 18.45 current US$ per square kilometre in South Asia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per between Mozambique and South Asia?
53.8 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and South Asia?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Mozambique and South Asia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
Mozambique ranks 21st and South Asia ranks 24th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs South Asia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/south-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/south-asia/">Mozambique vs South Asia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 7,513 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.