South Sudan vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per

South Sudan
123.73 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
26.5 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
South Sudan rank
15th
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
17th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per over time

  • South Sudan
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
050100150197019962023

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 123.73 current US$ per square kilometre against 26.5 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 97.23 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 4.7 times Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 11 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.

South Sudan ranks 15th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 17th of 142 countries.

South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Sudan Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
2010s 119.16 current US$ per square kilometre 27.82 current US$ per square kilometre 91.35 current US$ per square kilometre South Sudan
2020s 110.05 current US$ per square kilometre 26.12 current US$ per square kilometre 83.93 current US$ per square kilometre South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per, South Sudan or Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
South Sudan, at 123.73 current US$ per square kilometre against 26.5 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per between South Sudan and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
97.23 current US$ per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
How do South Sudan and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
South Sudan ranks 15th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 17th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Sudan vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/south-sudan/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/south-sudan/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">South Sudan vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 7,513 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.