Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Moldova: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway … Norway unit

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Moldova
0.0045 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank
8th
Moldova rank
5th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway … Norway unit over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
  • Moldova
00.0010.0020.0030.0040.005198720052023

How they compare

Moldova currently reports 0.0045 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 0.0041 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Moldova's figure about 11.3 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 8th and Moldova ranks 5th of 44 groups.

Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) Moldova Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP Moldova
2010s 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP Moldova
2020s 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0017 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0015 current US$ per US$ of GDP Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or Moldova?
Moldova, at 0.0045 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Moldova?
0.0041 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Moldova?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Moldova rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 8th and Moldova ranks 5th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Moldova: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/moldova/">Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Moldova: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 7,441 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.