Late-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per

Late-demographic dividend
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Rwanda
0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Late-demographic dividend rank
36th
Rwanda rank
33rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per over time

  • Late-demographic dividend
  • Rwanda
00.0050.010.0150.02197019962023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 30.8 times Late-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Rwanda ahead.

Late-demographic dividend ranks 36th and Rwanda ranks 33rd of 44 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Late-demographic dividend Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1980s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0006 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1990s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0056 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0055 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2000s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0019 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0018 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2010s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2020s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per, Late-demographic dividend or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Late-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per between Late-demographic dividend and Rwanda?
0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Late-demographic dividend and Rwanda?
40 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2022.
How do Late-demographic dividend and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
Late-demographic dividend ranks 36th and Rwanda ranks 33rd of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Late-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/late-demographic-dividend/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/late-demographic-dividend/rwanda/">Late-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 7,441 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.