Jamaica vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway

Jamaica
5,455 current US$
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
1,321 current US$
in 2019
Jamaica rank
136th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
137th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway over time

  • Jamaica
  • Sao Tome and Principe
02.0M4.0M6.0M197319962019

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 5,455 current US$ against 1,321 current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 4,134 current US$.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 4.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Jamaica has been ahead every year.

Jamaica ranks 136th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 137th of 144 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 880,000 current US$ 20,000 current US$ 860,000 current US$ Jamaica
2000s 294,000 current US$ 70,000 current US$ 224,000 current US$ Jamaica
2010s 5,455 current US$ 1,321 current US$ 4,134 current US$ Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway, Jamaica or Sao Tome and Principe?
Jamaica, at 5,455 current US$ against 1,321 current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway between Jamaica and Sao Tome and Principe?
4,134 current US$, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Sao Tome and Principe?
7 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2019.
How do Jamaica and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway?
Jamaica ranks 136th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 137th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us/jamaica/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us/jamaica/sao-tome-and-principe/">Jamaica vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 7,656 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.