OECD members vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway

OECD members
61.24 million current US$
in 2022
Zimbabwe
6.81 million current US$
in 2023
OECD members rank
36th
Zimbabwe rank
41st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway over time

  • OECD members
  • Zimbabwe
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M197019962023

How they compare

OECD members currently reports 61.24 million current US$ against 6.81 million current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 54.43 million current US$.

That makes OECD members's figure about 9.0 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1980 it was OECD members ahead.

OECD members ranks 36th and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 45 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, OECD members averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 2.37 million current US$ 13.03 million current US$ 10.66 million current US$ Zimbabwe
1990s 25.63 million current US$ 18.65 million current US$ 6.99 million current US$ OECD members
2000s 25.17 million current US$ 12.94 million current US$ 12.23 million current US$ OECD members
2010s 44.19 million current US$ 18.58 million current US$ 25.61 million current US$ OECD members
2020s 66.21 million current US$ 5.83 million current US$ 60.38 million current US$ OECD members

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway, OECD members or Zimbabwe?
OECD members, at 61.24 million current US$ against 6.81 million current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway between OECD members and Zimbabwe?
54.43 million current US$, with OECD members ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Zimbabwe?
43 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2022.
How do OECD members and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway?
OECD members ranks 36th and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us/oecd-members/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us/oecd-members/zimbabwe/">OECD members vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 7,641 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.