Other small states vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway over time
- Other small states
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 6.81 million current US$ against 2.50 million current US$ in Other small states, a difference of 4.31 million current US$.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 2.7 times Other small states's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Other small states ahead.
Other small states ranks 42nd and Zimbabwe ranks 40th of 45 groups.
Across the 5 decades both report, Other small states averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Other small states | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 18.65 million current US$ | 13.03 million current US$ | 5.61 million current US$ | Other small states |
| 1990s | 32.01 million current US$ | 18.65 million current US$ | 13.36 million current US$ | Other small states |
| 2000s | 19.78 million current US$ | 12.94 million current US$ | 6.84 million current US$ | Other small states |
| 2010s | 11.08 million current US$ | 18.58 million current US$ | 7.50 million current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 9.40 million current US$ | 5.83 million current US$ | 3.57 million current US$ | Other small states |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway, Other small states or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 6.81 million current US$ against 2.50 million current US$ in Other small states as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway between Other small states and Zimbabwe?
- 4.31 million current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Other small states and Zimbabwe?
- 43 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2022.
- How do Other small states and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway?
- Other small states ranks 42nd and Zimbabwe ranks 40th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.