Comoros vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Poland

Comoros
22,657 current US$
in 2023
Zimbabwe
24,466 current US$
in 2023
Comoros rank
76th
Zimbabwe rank
75th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Poland over time

  • Comoros
  • Zimbabwe
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k200520142023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 24,466 current US$ against 22,657 current US$ in Comoros, a difference of 1,809 current US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Comoros's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Comoros ranks 76th and Zimbabwe ranks 75th of 110 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 4,167 current US$ 766,432 current US$ 762,265 current US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 31,104 current US$ 656,938 current US$ 625,834 current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, poland, Comoros or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 24,466 current US$ against 22,657 current US$ in Comoros as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, poland between Comoros and Zimbabwe?
1,809 current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Zimbabwe?
5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
How do Comoros and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, poland?
Comoros ranks 76th and Zimbabwe ranks 75th of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Poland (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Poland (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
155 places, 2,392 data points, 2005–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.