Tunisia vs Viet Nam: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Poland
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Poland over time
- Tunisia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 344,463 current US$ against 333,602 current US$ in Viet Nam, a difference of 10,861 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Tunisia ranks 34th and Viet Nam ranks 37th of 111 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tunisia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62,500 current US$ | 685,000 current US$ | 622,500 current US$ | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 176,219 current US$ | 1.82 million current US$ | 1.64 million current US$ | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 1.10 million current US$ | 3.11 million current US$ | 2.00 million current US$ | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, poland, Tunisia or Viet Nam?
- Tunisia, at 344,463 current US$ against 333,602 current US$ in Viet Nam as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, poland between Tunisia and Viet Nam?
- 10,861 current US$, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Viet Nam?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Tunisia and Viet Nam rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, poland?
- Tunisia ranks 34th and Viet Nam ranks 37th of 111 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Poland (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.