Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Portugal

Equatorial Guinea
76,617 current US$
in 2023
Eswatini
75,691 current US$
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
50th
Eswatini rank
51st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Portugal over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Eswatini
050.0k100.0k150.0k200020112023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 76,617 current US$ against 75,691 current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 926 current US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Eswatini ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 50th and Eswatini ranks 51st of 95 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Eswatini Difference Ahead
2010s 71,355 current US$ 108,256 current US$ 36,901 current US$ Eswatini
2020s 106,915 current US$ 58,754 current US$ 48,161 current US$ Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, portugal, Equatorial Guinea or Eswatini?
Equatorial Guinea, at 76,617 current US$ against 75,691 current US$ in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, portugal between Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini?
926 current US$, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini?
11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, portugal?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 50th and Eswatini ranks 51st of 95 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Portugal (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Portugal. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-portugal-current-us/equatorial-guinea/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-portugal-current-us/equatorial-guinea/eswatini/">Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Portugal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Portugal (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
140 places, 3,053 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.