Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Portugal
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Portugal over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Serbia
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 76,617 current US$ against 74,225 current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 2,392 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Serbia ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 50th and Serbia ranks 52nd of 95 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50,000 current US$ | 4.98 million current US$ | 4.93 million current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 63,685 current US$ | 119,424 current US$ | 55,738 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2020s | 106,915 current US$ | 58,624 current US$ | 48,291 current US$ | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, portugal, Equatorial Guinea or Serbia?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 76,617 current US$ against 74,225 current US$ in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, portugal between Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?
- 2,392 current US$, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Serbia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, portugal?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 50th and Serbia ranks 52nd of 95 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Portugal (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.