Equatorial Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Portugal
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Portugal over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 77,024 current US$ against 76,617 current US$ in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 407 current US$.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 51st and Zimbabwe ranks 50th of 96 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35,000 current US$ | 125,000 current US$ | 90,000 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 63,685 current US$ | 70,594 current US$ | 6,908 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 106,915 current US$ | 65,142 current US$ | 41,772 current US$ | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, portugal, Equatorial Guinea or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 77,024 current US$ against 76,617 current US$ in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, portugal between Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe?
- 407 current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, portugal?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 51st and Zimbabwe ranks 50th of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Portugal (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.