Barbados vs Eritrea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps
Barbados
40,000 current US$
in 2010
Eritrea
38,616 current US$
in 2023
Barbados rank
100th
Eritrea rank
101st
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps over time
- Barbados
- Eritrea
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 40,000 current US$ against 38,616 current US$ in Eritrea, a difference of 1,384 current US$.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 100th and Eritrea ranks 101st of 143 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42,000 current US$ | 693,000 current US$ | 651,000 current US$ | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 40,000 current US$ | 180,000 current US$ | 140,000 current US$ | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps, Barbados or Eritrea?
- Barbados, at 40,000 current US$ against 38,616 current US$ in Eritrea as of 2010.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps between Barbados and Eritrea?
- 1,384 current US$, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Eritrea?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2010.
- How do Barbados and Eritrea rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps?
- Barbados ranks 100th and Eritrea ranks 101st of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) with 237 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.