Barbados vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps over time
- Barbados
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 40,000 current US$ against 35,052 current US$ in Sri Lanka, a difference of 4,948 current US$.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Barbados ranks 100th and Sri Lanka ranks 103rd of 143 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58,333 current US$ | 11.78 million current US$ | 11.72 million current US$ | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 40,000 current US$ | -730,000 current US$ | 770,000 current US$ | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps, Barbados or Sri Lanka?
- Barbados, at 40,000 current US$ against 35,052 current US$ in Sri Lanka as of 2010.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps between Barbados and Sri Lanka?
- 4,948 current US$, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Sri Lanka?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2010.
- How do Barbados and Sri Lanka rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps?
- Barbados ranks 100th and Sri Lanka ranks 103rd of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) with 237 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.