Barbados vs Tajikistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps over time
- Barbados
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 44,777 current US$ against 40,000 current US$ in Barbados, a difference of 4,777 current US$.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 100th and Tajikistan ranks 98th of 143 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66,000 current US$ | 2.38 million current US$ | 2.32 million current US$ | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 40,000 current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps, Barbados or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 44,777 current US$ against 40,000 current US$ in Barbados as of 2020.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps between Barbados and Tajikistan?
- 4,777 current US$, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Tajikistan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2010.
- How do Barbados and Tajikistan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps?
- Barbados ranks 100th and Tajikistan ranks 98th of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) with 237 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.