Belarus vs Kosovo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps over time
- Belarus
- Kosovo
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 14,048 current US$ against 9,677 current US$ in Kosovo, a difference of 4,371 current US$.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.5 times Kosovo's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Kosovo ahead.
Belarus ranks 111th and Kosovo ranks 113th of 143 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Kosovo in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 770,000 current US$ | 930,000 current US$ | 160,000 current US$ | Kosovo |
| 2010s | 175,486 current US$ | 170,799 current US$ | 4,687 current US$ | Belarus |
| 2020s | 46,583 current US$ | 222,472 current US$ | 175,888 current US$ | Kosovo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps, Belarus or Kosovo?
- Belarus, at 14,048 current US$ against 9,677 current US$ in Kosovo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps between Belarus and Kosovo?
- 4,371 current US$, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kosovo?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Kosovo rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps?
- Belarus ranks 111th and Kosovo ranks 113th of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) with 237 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.