Belize vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps
Belize
34,178 current US$
in 2022
Latvia
20,000 current US$
in 2004
Belize rank
104th
Latvia rank
107th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps over time
- Belize
- Latvia
How they compare
Belize currently reports 34,178 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 14,178 current US$.
That makes Belize's figure about 1.7 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Latvia ahead.
Belize ranks 104th and Latvia ranks 107th of 143 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -240,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 250,000 current US$ | Latvia |
| 2000s | 30,000 current US$ | 22,000 current US$ | 8,000 current US$ | Belize |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps, Belize or Latvia?
- Belize, at 34,178 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Latvia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps between Belize and Latvia?
- 14,178 current US$, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Latvia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2004.
- How do Belize and Latvia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps?
- Belize ranks 104th and Latvia ranks 107th of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) with 237 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.