Botswana vs North Korea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current) … Spain gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current) … Spain gaps over time
- Botswana
- North Korea
How they compare
North Korea currently reports 354 current US$ against 43 current US$ in Botswana, a difference of 311 current US$.
That makes North Korea's figure about 8.2 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2003 it was North Korea ahead.
Botswana ranks 121st and North Korea ranks 120th of 143 countries.
North Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | North Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84,286 current US$ | 582,143 current US$ | 497,857 current US$ | North Korea |
| 2010s | 5,178 current US$ | 84,670 current US$ | 79,493 current US$ | North Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps, Botswana or North Korea?
- North Korea, at 354 current US$ against 43 current US$ in Botswana as of 2016.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps between Botswana and North Korea?
- 311 current US$, with North Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and North Korea?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2015.
- How do Botswana and North Korea rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps?
- Botswana ranks 121st and North Korea ranks 120th of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) with 237 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.