Cape Verde vs Poland: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps over time
- Cape Verde
- Poland
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 2.27 million current US$ against 2.11 million current US$ in Poland, a difference of 159,300 current US$.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Poland ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 42nd and Poland ranks 44th of 143 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 957,778 current US$ | 1.67 million current US$ | 710,000 current US$ | Poland |
| 2000s | 3.20 million current US$ | 64,000 current US$ | 3.14 million current US$ | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps, Cape Verde or Poland?
- Cape Verde, at 2.27 million current US$ against 2.11 million current US$ in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps between Cape Verde and Poland?
- 159,300 current US$, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Poland?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Cape Verde and Poland rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps?
- Cape Verde ranks 42nd and Poland ranks 44th of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) with 237 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.