Croatia vs Czechia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps
Croatia
440,000 current US$
in 2010
Czechia
450,000 current US$
in 2004
Croatia rank
70th
Czechia rank
68th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps over time
- Croatia
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 450,000 current US$ against 440,000 current US$ in Croatia, a difference of 10,000 current US$.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 70th and Czechia ranks 68th of 143 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 485,000 current US$ | 168,333 current US$ | 316,667 current US$ | Croatia |
| 2000s | 496,000 current US$ | 269,000 current US$ | 227,000 current US$ | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps, Croatia or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 450,000 current US$ against 440,000 current US$ in Croatia as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps between Croatia and Czechia?
- 10,000 current US$, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Czechia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2004.
- How do Croatia and Czechia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps?
- Croatia ranks 70th and Czechia ranks 68th of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) with 237 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.