Czechia vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps over time
- Czechia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 576,297 current US$ against 450,000 current US$ in Czechia, a difference of 126,297 current US$.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Czechia ranks 68th and Zimbabwe ranks 65th of 143 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 175,556 current US$ | 3.00 million current US$ | 2.83 million current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 269,000 current US$ | 396,000 current US$ | 127,000 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps, Czechia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 576,297 current US$ against 450,000 current US$ in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps between Czechia and Zimbabwe?
- 126,297 current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Zimbabwe?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Czechia and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps?
- Czechia ranks 68th and Zimbabwe ranks 65th of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) with 237 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.