Estonia vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps
Estonia
60,000 current US$
in 2004
Zambia
49,918 current US$
in 2023
Estonia rank
93rd
Zambia rank
96th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps over time
- Estonia
- Zambia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 60,000 current US$ against 49,918 current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 10,082 current US$.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.2 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zambia ahead.
Estonia ranks 93rd and Zambia ranks 96th of 143 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 20,000 current US$ | 104,000 current US$ | 84,000 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2000s | 34,000 current US$ | 436,000 current US$ | 402,000 current US$ | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps, Estonia or Zambia?
- Estonia, at 60,000 current US$ against 49,918 current US$ in Zambia as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps between Estonia and Zambia?
- 10,082 current US$, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Zambia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2004.
- How do Estonia and Zambia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps?
- Estonia ranks 93rd and Zambia ranks 96th of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) with 237 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.