Jamaica vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps
Jamaica
19,193 current US$
in 2023
Latvia
20,000 current US$
in 2004
Jamaica rank
109th
Latvia rank
107th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps over time
- Jamaica
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 20,000 current US$ against 19,193 current US$ in Jamaica, a difference of 807 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 109th and Latvia ranks 107th of 143 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 52,500 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 42,500 current US$ | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 142,000 current US$ | 22,000 current US$ | 120,000 current US$ | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps, Jamaica or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 20,000 current US$ against 19,193 current US$ in Jamaica as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps between Jamaica and Latvia?
- 807 current US$, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Latvia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2004.
- How do Jamaica and Latvia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps?
- Jamaica ranks 109th and Latvia ranks 107th of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) with 237 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.