Latvia vs Slovenia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps
Latvia
20,000 current US$
in 2004
Slovenia
30,000 current US$
in 2002
Latvia rank
107th
Slovenia rank
105th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps over time
- Latvia
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 30,000 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 10,000 current US$.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.5 times Latvia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 107th and Slovenia ranks 105th of 143 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10,000 current US$ | 65,000 current US$ | 55,000 current US$ | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 13,333 current US$ | 53,333 current US$ | 40,000 current US$ | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps, Latvia or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 30,000 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Latvia as of 2002.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps between Latvia and Slovenia?
- 10,000 current US$, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Slovenia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2002.
- How do Latvia and Slovenia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps?
- Latvia ranks 107th and Slovenia ranks 105th of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) with 237 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.