Lithuania vs Moldova: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current) … Spain gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current) … Spain gaps over time
- Lithuania
- Moldova
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 60,591 current US$ against 50,000 current US$ in Lithuania, a difference of 10,591 current US$.
That makes Moldova's figure about 1.2 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 95th and Moldova ranks 92nd of 143 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 33,333 current US$ | 15,000 current US$ | 18,333 current US$ | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 36,000 current US$ | 18,000 current US$ | 18,000 current US$ | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps, Lithuania or Moldova?
- Moldova, at 60,591 current US$ against 50,000 current US$ in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps between Lithuania and Moldova?
- 10,591 current US$, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Moldova?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2004.
- How do Lithuania and Moldova rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps?
- Lithuania ranks 95th and Moldova ranks 92nd of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) with 237 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.