Malta vs Slovenia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps
Malta
20,000 current US$
in 2002
Slovenia
30,000 current US$
in 2002
Malta rank
107th
Slovenia rank
105th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps over time
- Malta
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 30,000 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Malta, a difference of 10,000 current US$.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.5 times Malta's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 107th and Slovenia ranks 105th of 143 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 30,000 current US$ | 65,000 current US$ | 35,000 current US$ | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 26,667 current US$ | 53,333 current US$ | 26,667 current US$ | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps, Malta or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 30,000 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Malta as of 2002.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps between Malta and Slovenia?
- 10,000 current US$, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Slovenia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2002.
- How do Malta and Slovenia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps?
- Malta ranks 107th and Slovenia ranks 105th of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) with 237 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.