Mauritius vs Myanmar: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps over time
- Mauritius
- Myanmar
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 2,015 current US$ against 431 current US$ in Myanmar, a difference of 1,584 current US$.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 4.7 times Myanmar's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Myanmar ahead.
Mauritius ranks 116th and Myanmar ranks 119th of 143 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Myanmar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17,500 current US$ | 5.12 million current US$ | 5.10 million current US$ | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 21,431 current US$ | 6,679 current US$ | 14,752 current US$ | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps, Mauritius or Myanmar?
- Mauritius, at 2,015 current US$ against 431 current US$ in Myanmar as of 2019.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps between Mauritius and Myanmar?
- 1,584 current US$, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Myanmar?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and Myanmar rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps?
- Mauritius ranks 116th and Myanmar ranks 119th of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) with 237 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.