Romania vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current) … Spain gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current) … Spain gaps over time
- Romania
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 1.62 million current US$ against 1.49 million current US$ in Romania, a difference of 132,410 current US$.
That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Tanzania ahead.
Romania ranks 50th and Tanzania ranks 48th of 143 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 737,778 current US$ | 2.09 million current US$ | 1.36 million current US$ | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 1.80 million current US$ | 2.13 million current US$ | 330,000 current US$ | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps, Romania or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 1.62 million current US$ against 1.49 million current US$ in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps between Romania and Tanzania?
- 132,410 current US$, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Tanzania?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Romania and Tanzania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), gaps?
- Romania ranks 50th and Tanzania ranks 48th of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) with 237 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.