Cuba vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per

Cuba
0.9784 current US$ per person
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
0.1278 current US$ per person
in 2023
Cuba rank
20th
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
19th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per over time

  • Cuba
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
050100150200198020012023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0.9784 current US$ per person against 0.1278 current US$ per person in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 0.8506 current US$ per person.

That makes Cuba's figure about 7.7 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 37 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 20th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 19th of 143 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
1980s 1.16 current US$ per person 0.0661 current US$ per person 1.09 current US$ per person Cuba
1990s 0.9783 current US$ per person 0.229 current US$ per person 0.7493 current US$ per person Cuba
2000s 1.82 current US$ per person 0.5013 current US$ per person 1.32 current US$ per person Cuba
2010s 20.91 current US$ per person 0.2711 current US$ per person 20.64 current US$ per person Cuba
2020s 0.7802 current US$ per person 0.1328 current US$ per person 0.6474 current US$ per person Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per, Cuba or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
Cuba, at 0.9784 current US$ per person against 0.1278 current US$ per person in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per between Cuba and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
0.8506 current US$ per person, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
37 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per?
Cuba ranks 20th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 19th of 143 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-spain-current-us-per-capita/cuba/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-spain-current-us-per-capita/cuba/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">Cuba vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 5,386 data points, 1980–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.