Central Europe and the Baltics vs Paraguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per

Central Europe and the Baltics
0.3985 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Paraguay
16.97 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
37th
Paraguay rank
39th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Paraguay
0255075100198920062023

How they compare

Paraguay currently reports 16.97 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.3985 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 16.57 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Paraguay's figure about 42.6 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Central Europe and the Baltics ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 37th and Paraguay ranks 39th of 46 groups.

Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Paraguay Difference Ahead
1990s 5.79 current US$ per square kilometre 19.03 current US$ per square kilometre 13.24 current US$ per square kilometre Paraguay
2000s 2.94 current US$ per square kilometre 32.08 current US$ per square kilometre 29.14 current US$ per square kilometre Paraguay
2010s 0.3985 current US$ per square kilometre 54.97 current US$ per square kilometre 54.57 current US$ per square kilometre Paraguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per, Central Europe and the Baltics or Paraguay?
Paraguay, at 16.97 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.3985 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per between Central Europe and the Baltics and Paraguay?
16.57 current US$ per square kilometre, with Paraguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Paraguay?
18 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2010.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Paraguay rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 37th and Paraguay ranks 39th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Paraguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-spain-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/paraguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-spain-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/paraguay/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Paraguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 5,333 data points, 1980–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.