Cuba vs Early-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per

Cuba
103.88 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Early-demographic dividend
8.16 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Cuba rank
15th
Early-demographic dividend rank
15th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per over time

  • Cuba
  • Early-demographic dividend
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k198720052023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 103.88 current US$ per square kilometre against 8.16 current US$ per square kilometre in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 95.72 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 12.7 times Early-demographic dividend's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 15th and Early-demographic dividend ranks 15th of 142 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Early-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1980s 113.28 current US$ per square kilometre 2.54 current US$ per square kilometre 110.74 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 99.13 current US$ per square kilometre 11.26 current US$ per square kilometre 87.88 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 192.42 current US$ per square kilometre 25.84 current US$ per square kilometre 166.57 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 2,263 current US$ per square kilometre 9.85 current US$ per square kilometre 2,253 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 76.42 current US$ per square kilometre 7.83 current US$ per square kilometre 68.59 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per, Cuba or Early-demographic dividend?
Cuba, at 103.88 current US$ per square kilometre against 8.16 current US$ per square kilometre in Early-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per between Cuba and Early-demographic dividend?
95.72 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Early-demographic dividend?
36 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2022.
How do Cuba and Early-demographic dividend rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per?
Cuba ranks 15th and Early-demographic dividend ranks 15th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Early-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-spain-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/early-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-spain-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/early-demographic-dividend/">Cuba vs Early-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 5,333 data points, 1980–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.