Least developed countries vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per

Least developed countries
7.8 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Rwanda
79.17 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Least developed countries rank
17th
Rwanda rank
19th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Rwanda
02505007501.0k198720052023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 79.17 current US$ per square kilometre against 7.8 current US$ per square kilometre in Least developed countries, a difference of 71.37 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 10.2 times Least developed countries's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Rwanda ahead.

Least developed countries ranks 17th and Rwanda ranks 19th of 46 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Rwanda Difference Ahead
1980s 2.43 current US$ per square kilometre 3.65 current US$ per square kilometre 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 4.64 current US$ per square kilometre 94.27 current US$ per square kilometre 89.63 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 17.47 current US$ per square kilometre 259.18 current US$ per square kilometre 241.72 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 12.77 current US$ per square kilometre 42.46 current US$ per square kilometre 29.7 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 7.19 current US$ per square kilometre 176.27 current US$ per square kilometre 169.08 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per, Least developed countries or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 79.17 current US$ per square kilometre against 7.8 current US$ per square kilometre in Least developed countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per between Least developed countries and Rwanda?
71.37 current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Rwanda?
33 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2022.
How do Least developed countries and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, spain (current us$), per?
Least developed countries ranks 17th and Rwanda ranks 19th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-spain-current-us-per-square-kilometre/least-developed-countries-un-classification/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-spain-current-us-per-square-kilometre/least-developed-countries-un-classification/rwanda/">Least developed countries vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 5,333 data points, 1980–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.