Botswana vs High income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual

Botswana
59.46 % change on previous year
in 2023
High income
-6.9 % change on previous year
in 2023
Botswana rank
19th
High income rank
22nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual over time

  • Botswana
  • High income
-2000200400600196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 59.46 % change on previous year against -6.9 % change on previous year in High income, a difference of 66.36 % change on previous year.

That makes Botswana's figure about 8.6 times High income's.

The two have swapped places 23 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1968 it was High income ahead.

Botswana ranks 19th and High income ranks 22nd of 136 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 4 and High income in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana High income Difference Ahead
1960s -13.5 % change on previous year 28.6 % change on previous year 42.1 % change on previous year High income
1970s 85.13 % change on previous year 72.69 % change on previous year 12.45 % change on previous year Botswana
1980s 9.62 % change on previous year 115.24 % change on previous year 105.62 % change on previous year High income
1990s -8.48 % change on previous year 17.83 % change on previous year 26.31 % change on previous year High income
2000s 46.22 % change on previous year -4.52 % change on previous year 50.74 % change on previous year Botswana
2010s 72.2 % change on previous year -11.51 % change on previous year 83.71 % change on previous year Botswana
2020s -17.78 % change on previous year -30.29 % change on previous year 12.51 % change on previous year Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual, Botswana or High income?
Botswana, at 59.46 % change on previous year against -6.9 % change on previous year in High income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual between Botswana and High income?
66.36 % change on previous year, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and High income?
52 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Botswana and High income rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual?
Botswana ranks 19th and High income ranks 22nd of 136 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs High income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-annual-growth-rate/botswana/high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-annual-growth-rate/botswana/high-income/">Botswana vs High income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
182 places, 6,670 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.