East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Israel: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual over time
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- Israel
How they compare
Israel currently reports 180 % change on previous year against 5.66 % change on previous year in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 174.34 % change on previous year.
That makes Israel's figure about 31.8 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 1982 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 11th and Israel ranks 9th of 46 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) averaged higher in 1 and Israel in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | -3.58 % change on previous year | -27.44 % change on previous year | 23.87 % change on previous year | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
| 1990s | 15.78 % change on previous year | 98.95 % change on previous year | 83.18 % change on previous year | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Israel?
- Israel, at 180 % change on previous year against 5.66 % change on previous year in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 1996.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Israel?
- 174.34 % change on previous year, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Israel?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 1996.
- How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Israel rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 11th and Israel ranks 9th of 46 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.