East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Georgia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
-26.39 % change on previous year
in 2022
Georgia
24.32 % change on previous year
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
40th
Georgia rank
37th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Georgia
0200400600197219972023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 24.32 % change on previous year against -26.39 % change on previous year in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 50.71 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1995 it was East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 40th and Georgia ranks 37th of 46 groups.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s -2.9 % change on previous year 13.61 % change on previous year 16.51 % change on previous year Georgia
2000s 7.58 % change on previous year 34.25 % change on previous year 26.67 % change on previous year Georgia
2010s -2.98 % change on previous year 0.2612 % change on previous year 3.25 % change on previous year Georgia
2020s 0.5786 % change on previous year 6.33 % change on previous year 5.75 % change on previous year Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Georgia?
Georgia, at 24.32 % change on previous year against -26.39 % change on previous year in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Georgia?
50.71 % change on previous year, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Georgia?
28 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2022.
How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Georgia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 40th and Georgia ranks 37th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Georgia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-annual-growth-rate/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-annual-growth-rate/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/georgia/">East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Georgia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
182 places, 6,670 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.