Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Korea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
95.98 % change on previous year
in 2022
Korea
518.18 % change on previous year
in 1999
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
3rd
Korea rank
3rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Korea
-50005001.0k196119912022

How they compare

Korea currently reports 518.18 % change on previous year against 95.98 % change on previous year in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 422.2 % change on previous year.

That makes Korea's figure about 5.4 times Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 3rd and Korea ranks 3rd of 46 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) averaged higher in 1 and Korea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) Korea Difference Ahead
1970s -1.83 % change on previous year -42.29 % change on previous year 40.45 % change on previous year Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
1990s 182.23 % change on previous year 237.64 % change on previous year 55.41 % change on previous year Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual, Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) or Korea?
Korea, at 518.18 % change on previous year against 95.98 % change on previous year in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 1999.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual between Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Korea?
422.2 % change on previous year, with Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Korea?
7 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 1999.
How do Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Korea rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual?
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 3rd and Korea ranks 3rd of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Korea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-annual-growth-rate/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-annual-growth-rate/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/korea-rep/">Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Korea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
182 places, 6,670 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.