Albania vs Euro area: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time
- Albania
- Euro area
How they compare
Euro area currently reports 17.50 million current US$ against 12.13 million current US$ in Albania, a difference of 5.37 million current US$.
That makes Euro area's figure about 1.4 times Albania's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Euro area has been ahead every year.
Albania ranks 40th and Euro area ranks 39th of 142 countries.
Euro area has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Euro area | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.58 million current US$ | 33.83 million current US$ | 32.25 million current US$ | Euro area |
| 2000s | 3.85 million current US$ | 23.97 million current US$ | 20.11 million current US$ | Euro area |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Albania or Euro area?
- Euro area, at 17.50 million current US$ against 12.13 million current US$ in Albania as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Albania and Euro area?
- 5.37 million current US$, with Euro area ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Euro area?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Albania and Euro area rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Albania ranks 40th and Euro area ranks 39th of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.