Angola vs Hungary: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps
Angola
1.10 million current US$
in 2023
Hungary
1.07 million current US$
in 2004
Angola rank
83rd
Hungary rank
85th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time
- Angola
- Hungary
How they compare
Angola currently reports 1.10 million current US$ against 1.07 million current US$ in Hungary, a difference of 27,760 current US$.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 83rd and Hungary ranks 85th of 142 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 28.71 million current US$ | 328,000 current US$ | 28.38 million current US$ | Angola |
| 2000s | 15.17 million current US$ | 468,000 current US$ | 14.71 million current US$ | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Angola or Hungary?
- Angola, at 1.10 million current US$ against 1.07 million current US$ in Hungary as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Angola and Hungary?
- 27,760 current US$, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Hungary?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Angola and Hungary rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Angola ranks 83rd and Hungary ranks 85th of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.