Belize vs Chile: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps
Belize
54,835 current US$
in 2023
Chile
66,690 current US$
in 2017
Belize rank
131st
Chile rank
128th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time
- Belize
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 66,690 current US$ against 54,835 current US$ in Belize, a difference of 11,855 current US$.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Belize's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Belize ranks 131st and Chile ranks 128th of 142 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14,286 current US$ | 6.40 million current US$ | 6.39 million current US$ | Chile |
| 2000s | 30,000 current US$ | 310,000 current US$ | 280,000 current US$ | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Belize or Chile?
- Chile, at 66,690 current US$ against 54,835 current US$ in Belize as of 2017.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Belize and Chile?
- 11,855 current US$, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Chile?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2006.
- How do Belize and Chile rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Belize ranks 131st and Chile ranks 128th of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.