Bosnia and Herzegovina vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps

Bosnia and Herzegovina
18.49 million current US$
in 2023
South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
156.79 million current US$
in 2022
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
30th
South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank
29th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M250.0M197019962023

How they compare

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) currently reports 156.79 million current US$ against 18.49 million current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 138.30 million current US$.

That makes South Asia (IDA & IBRD)'s figure about 8.5 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, South Asia (IDA & IBRD) has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 30th and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 29th of 142 countries.

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina South Asia (IDA & IBRD) Difference Ahead
1990s 34.02 million current US$ 99.68 million current US$ 65.67 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2000s 33.46 million current US$ 118.35 million current US$ 84.89 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2010s 23.76 million current US$ 192.52 million current US$ 168.76 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2020s 24.10 million current US$ 178.07 million current US$ 153.97 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Bosnia and Herzegovina or South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
South Asia (IDA & IBRD), at 156.79 million current US$ against 18.49 million current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Bosnia and Herzegovina and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
138.30 million current US$, with South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
29 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 30th and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 29th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-gaps-filled/bosnia-and-herzegovina/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-gaps-filled/bosnia-and-herzegovina/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 7,726 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.