Brazil vs Libya: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time
- Brazil
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 2.80 million current US$ against 2.64 million current US$ in Brazil, a difference of 154,820 current US$.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 66th and Libya ranks 64th of 142 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Libya in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.18 million current US$ | 70,833 current US$ | 2.11 million current US$ | Brazil |
| 2010s | 1.68 million current US$ | 6.69 million current US$ | 5.01 million current US$ | Libya |
| 2020s | 2.56 million current US$ | 5.36 million current US$ | 2.80 million current US$ | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Brazil or Libya?
- Libya, at 2.80 million current US$ against 2.64 million current US$ in Brazil as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Brazil and Libya?
- 154,820 current US$, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Libya?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Libya rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Brazil ranks 66th and Libya ranks 64th of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.