Cape Verde vs Comoros: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time
- Cape Verde
- Comoros
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 82,051 current US$ against 71,913 current US$ in Comoros, a difference of 10,138 current US$.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times Comoros's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 124th and Comoros ranks 126th of 142 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Comoros in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 121,430 current US$ | 28,229 current US$ | 93,200 current US$ | Cape Verde |
| 2020s | 86,991 current US$ | 111,336 current US$ | 24,345 current US$ | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Cape Verde or Comoros?
- Cape Verde, at 82,051 current US$ against 71,913 current US$ in Comoros as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Cape Verde and Comoros?
- 10,138 current US$, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Comoros?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Cape Verde and Comoros rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Cape Verde ranks 124th and Comoros ranks 126th of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.