Cape Verde vs Slovakia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time
- Cape Verde
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 100,000 current US$ against 82,051 current US$ in Cape Verde, a difference of 17,949 current US$.
That makes Slovakia's figure about 1.2 times Cape Verde's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 124th and Slovakia ranks 122nd of 142 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.10 million current US$ | 188,500 current US$ | 6.91 million current US$ | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 440,000 current US$ | 142,000 current US$ | 298,000 current US$ | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Cape Verde or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 100,000 current US$ against 82,051 current US$ in Cape Verde as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Cape Verde and Slovakia?
- 17,949 current US$, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Slovakia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Cape Verde and Slovakia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Cape Verde ranks 124th and Slovakia ranks 122nd of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.