Chile vs Croatia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time
- Chile
- Croatia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 80,000 current US$ against 66,690 current US$ in Chile, a difference of 13,310 current US$.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Croatia ahead.
Chile ranks 128th and Croatia ranks 125th of 142 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Croatia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.03 million current US$ | 5.77 million current US$ | 263,333 current US$ | Chile |
| 2000s | 1.10 million current US$ | 4.88 million current US$ | 3.78 million current US$ | Croatia |
| 2010s | 1.62 million current US$ | 80,000 current US$ | 1.54 million current US$ | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Chile or Croatia?
- Croatia, at 80,000 current US$ against 66,690 current US$ in Chile as of 2010.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Chile and Croatia?
- 13,310 current US$, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Croatia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2010.
- How do Chile and Croatia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Chile ranks 128th and Croatia ranks 125th of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.