Chile vs Czechia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps
Chile
66,690 current US$
in 2017
Czechia
60,000 current US$
in 2004
Chile rank
128th
Czechia rank
129th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time
- Chile
- Czechia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 66,690 current US$ against 60,000 current US$ in Czechia, a difference of 6,690 current US$.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 128th and Czechia ranks 129th of 142 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.80 million current US$ | 431,500 current US$ | 7.37 million current US$ | Chile |
| 2000s | 1.41 million current US$ | 342,000 current US$ | 1.06 million current US$ | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Chile or Czechia?
- Chile, at 66,690 current US$ against 60,000 current US$ in Czechia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Chile and Czechia?
- 6,690 current US$, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Czechia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Chile and Czechia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Chile ranks 128th and Czechia ranks 129th of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.