Congo vs Eritrea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps

Congo
287,746 current US$
in 2023
Eritrea
262,167 current US$
in 2023
Congo rank
112th
Eritrea rank
114th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time

  • Congo
  • Eritrea
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M196519942023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 287,746 current US$ against 262,167 current US$ in Eritrea, a difference of 25,579 current US$.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.

Congo ranks 112th and Eritrea ranks 114th of 142 countries.

Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Eritrea Difference Ahead
1990s 2.25 million current US$ 4.65 million current US$ 2.40 million current US$ Eritrea
2000s 2.28 million current US$ 3.58 million current US$ 1.30 million current US$ Eritrea
2010s 283,618 current US$ 519,748 current US$ 236,130 current US$ Eritrea
2020s 418,190 current US$ 562,105 current US$ 143,916 current US$ Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Congo or Eritrea?
Congo, at 287,746 current US$ against 262,167 current US$ in Eritrea as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Congo and Eritrea?
25,579 current US$, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Eritrea?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Congo and Eritrea rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
Congo ranks 112th and Eritrea ranks 114th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Eritrea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-gaps-filled/congo-rep/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-gaps-filled/congo-rep/eritrea/">Congo vs Eritrea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 7,726 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.