Czechia vs Mauritius: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time
- Czechia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 60,000 current US$ against 53,848 current US$ in Mauritius, a difference of 6,152 current US$.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mauritius ahead.
Czechia ranks 129th and Mauritius ranks 132nd of 142 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 457,500 current US$ | 1.18 million current US$ | 717,500 current US$ | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 90,000 current US$ | 15,000 current US$ | 75,000 current US$ | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Czechia or Mauritius?
- Czechia, at 60,000 current US$ against 53,848 current US$ in Mauritius as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Czechia and Mauritius?
- 6,152 current US$, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Mauritius?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Czechia and Mauritius rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Czechia ranks 129th and Mauritius ranks 132nd of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.