Ecuador vs Romania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps over time
- Ecuador
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 1.03 million current US$ against 897,473 current US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 132,527 current US$.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 89th and Romania ranks 87th of 142 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.82 million current US$ | 371,000 current US$ | 2.44 million current US$ | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 844,000 current US$ | 770,000 current US$ | 74,000 current US$ | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps, Ecuador or Romania?
- Romania, at 1.03 million current US$ against 897,473 current US$ in Ecuador as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps between Ecuador and Romania?
- 132,527 current US$, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Romania?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Ecuador and Romania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Ecuador ranks 89th and Romania ranks 87th of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.